Security v civil liberties

Security v civil liberties

Jon Zittrain, director of Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center, made valiant efforts as moderator of the session on security and civil liberties. He teased and cajoled the panellists and generated a lively debate on topics ranging from the treatment of prisoners in Camp X-Ray to identity cards to the International Court of Justice.

But with the best will in the world, Davos remains a very civil place. I was surprised that Irene Khan, secretary general of Amnesty International, didn’t lay into Republican senator Orrin Hatch. She said the right things — “Human rights isn’t an obstacle to security. It’s key to security” — but was polite, not incensed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *