Ben Goldacre, who writes the unmissable Bad Science column in The Guardian, has let his blood boil to the point where he writes a wonderful, lengthy diatribe against typical media coverage of science.
Science is done by scientists, who write it up. Then a press release is written by a non-scientist, who runs it by their non-scientist boss, who then sends it to journalists without a science education who try to convey difficult new ideas to an audience of either lay people, or more likely – since they’ll be the ones interested in reading the stuff – people who know their way around a t-test a lot better than any of these intermediaries. Finally, it’s edited by a whole team of people who don’t understand it. You can be sure that at least one person in any given “science communication” chain is just juggling words about on a page, without having the first clue what they mean, pretending they’ve got a proper job, their pens all lined up neatly on the desk.
There’s more, much more, all worth poring over.
Finance is done by financial people. Then a press release is written by a non-financier, who runs it by their non-financier boss, who then sends it to journalists without a finance education who try to convey difficult new ideas to an audience of either lay people, or more likely – since theyâll be the ones interested in reading the stuff – people who know their way around a put option a lot better than any of these intermediaries. Finally, itâs edited by a whole team of people who donât understand it. You can be sure that at least one person in any given âfinance communicationâ? chain is just juggling words about on a page, without having the first clue what they mean, pretending theyâve got a proper job, their pens all lined up neatly on the desk.
Or, more generally:
[Foo] is done by [Foo experts], who write it up. Then a press release is written by a non-[Foo expert], who runs it by their non-[Foo expert] boss, who then sends it to journalists without a [Foo] education who try to convey difficult new ideas to an audience of either lay people, or more likely – since theyâll be the ones interested in reading the stuff – people who know their way around a [Foo jargon term] a lot better than any of these intermediaries. Finally, itâs edited by a whole team of people who donât understand it. You can be sure that at least one person in any given â[Foo] communicationâ? chain is just juggling words about on a page, without having the first clue what they mean, pretending theyâve got a proper job, their pens all lined up neatly on the desk.
And the point is, exactly?
“Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
Please do not moderate my comment. It was intemperate by choice. Making it moderate removes any purpose in posting it.