Gideon Rachman comments on the slightly diverting Prospect/Foreign Policy poll to pick the world’s top public intellectuals. Others have correctly noted that the list is heavily skewed to the right of the political spectrum (Chomsky is a certain kind of left, but not my kind of left), and that it largely ignores blogs as a principal medium for today’s public intellectuals. Rachman’s colleague Martin Wolf – who’s rightly on the list of 100 – makes a more important point:
I popped next door to congratulate/tease Martin about his eminence. And he made rather a good point. (One would expect no less, of course.) Today’s intellectuals are a rather unimpressive bunch compared to a similar list of “public intellectuals” you could have compiled in 1850. Martin reeled off the names of Marx, Mill and de Tocqueville. To which I would add – Dickens, Tolstoy, Darwin, Balzac.
All of the above were already well known by 1850 and I think they stack up pretty well when compared with Chomsky, Fukuyama, Kagan – or even, dare I say it, Martin Wolf.
So are we living in some sort of intellectual dark age? Or have Prospect and Foreign Policy simply overlooked the great minds of our era?