<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davos redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2010/02/01/davos-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2010/02/01/davos-redux/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Richard Finlay</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2010/02/01/davos-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-366616</link>
		<dc:creator>J Richard Finlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=2658#comment-366616</guid>
		<description>When it comes right down to it, there are few thoughts the big players mount at Davos that could not be distilled into a simple Tweet.  Their use of technology and methods of transportation have changed, but in most other ways they are little different than the princes and grand dukes who trotted themselves out every so often to remind the people that they still existed, confusing – as receding fragments of supremacy so often do – vanity with relevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes right down to it, there are few thoughts the big players mount at Davos that could not be distilled into a simple Tweet.  Their use of technology and methods of transportation have changed, but in most other ways they are little different than the princes and grand dukes who trotted themselves out every so often to remind the people that they still existed, confusing – as receding fragments of supremacy so often do – vanity with relevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of Davos &#171; The Toynbee convector</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2010/02/01/davos-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-366200</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of Davos &#171; The Toynbee convector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=2658#comment-366200</guid>
		<description>[...] of&#160;Davos February 2, 2010   Lance Knobel defends the WEF here and here, denying that Davos is painted “in the style of George Grosz or Otto Dix”. (Kirchner, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of&nbsp;Davos February 2, 2010   Lance Knobel defends the WEF here and here, denying that Davos is painted “in the style of George Grosz or Otto Dix”. (Kirchner, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2010/02/01/davos-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-366198</link>
		<dc:creator>David Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=2658#comment-366198</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve spun a few more thoughts:

http://davidderrick.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/spirit-of-davos/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spun a few more thoughts:</p>
<p><a href="http://davidderrick.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/spirit-of-davos/" rel="nofollow">http://davidderrick.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/spirit-of-davos/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

