<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2008/01/31/why-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2008/01/31/why-obama/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a very public sociologist</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2008/01/31/why-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-226412</link>
		<dc:creator>a very public sociologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2008/01/31/why-obama/#comment-226412</guid>
		<description>The question is to what extent could an Obama administration be classed as progressive. For example, though it is likely he&#039;ll reverse Bush&#039;s obscene tax cuts for the wealthy, his economics advisors are the usual neo-liberal suspects who care only about enriching the have and hammering the have nots. That&#039;s not my idea of progressive politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is to what extent could an Obama administration be classed as progressive. For example, though it is likely he&#8217;ll reverse Bush&#8217;s obscene tax cuts for the wealthy, his economics advisors are the usual neo-liberal suspects who care only about enriching the have and hammering the have nots. That&#8217;s not my idea of progressive politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

