<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Depot response: positive culture change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broc Romanek</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/comment-page-1/#comment-10299</link>
		<dc:creator>Broc Romanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/#comment-10299</guid>
		<description>Home Depot: Calling Off the Dogs

In the wake of shareholder outcry at the way Home Depot&#039;s annual meeting was handled last week (as I blogged about a few days ago - also see this WSJ editorial), Home Depot issued this press release yesterday noting that next year&#039;s shareholder meeting will return to &quot;normal&quot; (ie. shareholders will be permitted to ask questions and directors will attend).

In addition, the company announced that it intends to implement &quot;majority vote measures&quot; since a shareholder proposal seeking a majority vote standard received support from 56% of those voting. It will be interesting to see what those &quot;measures&quot; comprise of given that 10 of Home Depot&#039;s 11 directors received high levels of withheld votes: over 30% (the only director not receiving a similar level is a brand new director). According to this WSJ article, these high levels are mainly due to anger over CEO pay. Depending on the math, if broker non-votes were not counted and a majority vote standard had been in place, this board might have been gone!

Interestingly, Home Depot has landed near the top of the ISS CGQ scoring system in recent years (99.6% right now) - which can be taken one of two ways, either the conduct of this meeting was an aberration or CGQ scores should be taken with a grain of salt...

Thanks, Broc Romanek
Editor, TheCorporateCounsel.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Home Depot: Calling Off the Dogs</p>
<p>In the wake of shareholder outcry at the way Home Depot&#8217;s annual meeting was handled last week (as I blogged about a few days ago &#8211; also see this WSJ editorial), Home Depot issued this press release yesterday noting that next year&#8217;s shareholder meeting will return to &#8220;normal&#8221; (ie. shareholders will be permitted to ask questions and directors will attend).</p>
<p>In addition, the company announced that it intends to implement &#8220;majority vote measures&#8221; since a shareholder proposal seeking a majority vote standard received support from 56% of those voting. It will be interesting to see what those &#8220;measures&#8221; comprise of given that 10 of Home Depot&#8217;s 11 directors received high levels of withheld votes: over 30% (the only director not receiving a similar level is a brand new director). According to this WSJ article, these high levels are mainly due to anger over CEO pay. Depending on the math, if broker non-votes were not counted and a majority vote standard had been in place, this board might have been gone!</p>
<p>Interestingly, Home Depot has landed near the top of the ISS CGQ scoring system in recent years (99.6% right now) &#8211; which can be taken one of two ways, either the conduct of this meeting was an aberration or CGQ scores should be taken with a grain of salt&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, Broc Romanek<br />
Editor, TheCorporateCounsel.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob M</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/comment-page-1/#comment-10263</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2006/06/01/home-depot-response-%e2%80%93-a-sign-of-positive-culture-change/#comment-10263</guid>
		<description>I agree with your last paragraph, Mr. Knobel.  It&#039;s a very good sign, and I think indicates a switched on PR/Comms department.  Good on you Sheryll Campbell for engaging in this conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your last paragraph, Mr. Knobel.  It&#8217;s a very good sign, and I think indicates a switched on PR/Comms department.  Good on you Sheryll Campbell for engaging in this conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

