<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where are the correcting mechanisms?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/comment-page-1/#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>Lance,

Happy New Year -

It would be nice to hear from you -

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance,</p>
<p>Happy New Year -</p>
<p>It would be nice to hear from you -</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City Comforts, the blog</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>City Comforts, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Outtakes&lt;/strong&gt;

Where are the correcting mechanisms?I’m not surprised that my letter hasn&#039;t run. The FT has extraordinarily little space for letters. Of course, they could be unconstrained for space on FT.com, but the site is so pitifully run compared to the hard c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Outtakes</strong></p>
<p>Where are the correcting mechanisms?I’m not surprised that my letter hasn&#8217;t run. The FT has extraordinarily little space for letters. Of course, they could be unconstrained for space on FT.com, but the site is so pitifully run compared to the hard c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/comment-page-1/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>pwb, does that mean that if enough people believe the world is flat, or that angels exist, then it&#039;s true?

Podcasting has a clear meaning, which is distinct from &quot;audiobook&quot;, and it&#039;s very easy to understand the difference.

However, since you managed to mis-parse the sentence &quot;The paper has had plenty of time to append a note to the interview with Friedman correcting his nonsense&quot; - try reading it with a comma after &quot;Friedman&quot; - then perhaps you&#039;re not going to get that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pwb, does that mean that if enough people believe the world is flat, or that angels exist, then it&#8217;s true?</p>
<p>Podcasting has a clear meaning, which is distinct from &#8220;audiobook&#8221;, and it&#8217;s very easy to understand the difference.</p>
<p>However, since you managed to mis-parse the sentence &#8220;The paper has had plenty of time to append a note to the interview with Friedman correcting his nonsense&#8221; &#8211; try reading it with a comma after &#8220;Friedman&#8221; &#8211; then perhaps you&#8217;re not going to get that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sucher</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most people?&quot; Since &quot;most people&quot; don&#039;t know what podcasting is, I  can&#039;t see how their confusion -- mixing up an audio book with a talk-show -- is authoritative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most people?&#8221; Since &#8220;most people&#8221; don&#8217;t know what podcasting is, I  can&#8217;t see how their confusion &#8212; mixing up an audio book with a talk-show &#8212; is authoritative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwb</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>pwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/12/01/where-are-the-correcting-mechanisms/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>What newspaper prints a correction from an interviewed subject?? Are you out of your mind?

Plus, I&#039;d hardly call Friedman&#039;s quote inaccurate. Given that most people share Friedman&#039;s definition of podcasting, his quote is entirely valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What newspaper prints a correction from an interviewed subject?? Are you out of your mind?</p>
<p>Plus, I&#8217;d hardly call Friedman&#8217;s quote inaccurate. Given that most people share Friedman&#8217;s definition of podcasting, his quote is entirely valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

