<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking forward to the Deakin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/05/10/looking-forward-to-the-deakin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/05/10/looking-forward-to-the-deakin/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2005/05/10/looking-forward-to-the-deakin/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 06:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=1297#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Hi Lance (and others)
I was the facilitator for a follow up event from the Deakin lecture series, which was basically inviting Lance and 16 year-12 students (final year of high school, a mixture of &#039;elite&#039; schools and govt. schools that service some of Melbourne&#039;s most disadvantaged areas) to share their thoughts and questions on the new media, its promise of increased access to information, the potential to become a media producer themselves and some of the attendant problems.
Both Lance and the students were Fab. The students were easy in their acceptance of a new world media - clearly they all were users, consumers and in one instance a producer or media provider. What was of concern to them was the idea of telling - what was reliable, what was true, what wasn&#039;t - but it was also evident that they struggled to have a critical framework to pose these concerns other than the notion of opinion vs. facts. And this isn&#039;t helped by an Australian media that seems to fall between pseudo-objective reportage and partisanship. I have no doubt after today&#039;s conversation, for some of them, it will further a more critical engagement with their info world. Lance, sincere thanks - that encounter was so valuable.
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lance (and others)<br />
I was the facilitator for a follow up event from the Deakin lecture series, which was basically inviting Lance and 16 year-12 students (final year of high school, a mixture of &#8216;elite&#8217; schools and govt. schools that service some of Melbourne&#8217;s most disadvantaged areas) to share their thoughts and questions on the new media, its promise of increased access to information, the potential to become a media producer themselves and some of the attendant problems.<br />
Both Lance and the students were Fab. The students were easy in their acceptance of a new world media &#8211; clearly they all were users, consumers and in one instance a producer or media provider. What was of concern to them was the idea of telling &#8211; what was reliable, what was true, what wasn&#8217;t &#8211; but it was also evident that they struggled to have a critical framework to pose these concerns other than the notion of opinion vs. facts. And this isn&#8217;t helped by an Australian media that seems to fall between pseudo-objective reportage and partisanship. I have no doubt after today&#8217;s conversation, for some of them, it will further a more critical engagement with their info world. Lance, sincere thanks &#8211; that encounter was so valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

