<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davosnewbies.com/2000/01/09/home-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2000/01/09/home-7/</link>
	<description>A year-round Davos of the mind, written since 1999 by Lance Knobel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Winer</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2000/01/09/home-7/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Winer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=98#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Lance, I&#039;ve been struggling with just this issue as I start to write about Davos. OK, so we can&#039;t call it a conference. Shall we just call it &quot;Davos&quot;? Or &quot;Davos 2000?&quot; (I&#039;m also referring to it as a &quot;meeting&quot;.)

Anyway, some updates. I talked with Garret Vreeland about being our designer, and he accepted the challenge. We&#039;re going to do a lite makeover for the site, keeping the focus on your words, and help to channel people to the resources they are interested in. We want to make this *the* showcase site for Manila for early 2000, we&#039;ve got the best story to cover, and we want to learn and evangelize.

I love the way you&#039;re using the pictures! We seem to be communicating by osmosis. I put them there so you could use them. Perfect.

I got the packet of materials on Friday. I read over the attendee list, which I understand is confidential. Is there a reason why the list is confidential? Does it remain confidential after the meeting? Is the attendee list available on the private site? I didn&#039;t see any instructions in the packet on how to access that site.

Also, we have registered &quot;www.davosnewbies.com&quot; and &quot;davosnewbies.com&quot;. My plan is to start using those URLs when the design is complete, probably on Monday or Tuesday.

When the site design is ready, could we send an email to the people who will be attending Davos 2000 letting them know that the site is here? You should write the email, if you want to do it. I would give you a bulleted list of pages they should be pointed to. 

BTW, feel free to edit the Introduction page. I just wanted to get the links out of the left margin to keep things simple. This was part of responding to Nico&#039;s excellent feedback.

I&#039;m getting more and more excited about Davos 2000! Is Clinton really coming? Are they really getting 1200 rooms? Am I going to lose my room? (This is what I&#039;m worried about.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance, I&#8217;ve been struggling with just this issue as I start to write about Davos. OK, so we can&#8217;t call it a conference. Shall we just call it &#8220;Davos&#8221;? Or &#8220;Davos 2000?&#8221; (I&#8217;m also referring to it as a &#8220;meeting&#8221;.)</p>
<p>Anyway, some updates. I talked with Garret Vreeland about being our designer, and he accepted the challenge. We&#8217;re going to do a lite makeover for the site, keeping the focus on your words, and help to channel people to the resources they are interested in. We want to make this *the* showcase site for Manila for early 2000, we&#8217;ve got the best story to cover, and we want to learn and evangelize.</p>
<p>I love the way you&#8217;re using the pictures! We seem to be communicating by osmosis. I put them there so you could use them. Perfect.</p>
<p>I got the packet of materials on Friday. I read over the attendee list, which I understand is confidential. Is there a reason why the list is confidential? Does it remain confidential after the meeting? Is the attendee list available on the private site? I didn&#8217;t see any instructions in the packet on how to access that site.</p>
<p>Also, we have registered &#8220;www.davosnewbies.com&#8221; and &#8220;davosnewbies.com&#8221;. My plan is to start using those URLs when the design is complete, probably on Monday or Tuesday.</p>
<p>When the site design is ready, could we send an email to the people who will be attending Davos 2000 letting them know that the site is here? You should write the email, if you want to do it. I would give you a bulleted list of pages they should be pointed to. </p>
<p>BTW, feel free to edit the Introduction page. I just wanted to get the links out of the left margin to keep things simple. This was part of responding to Nico&#8217;s excellent feedback.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting more and more excited about Davos 2000! Is Clinton really coming? Are they really getting 1200 rooms? Am I going to lose my room? (This is what I&#8217;m worried about.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Knobel</title>
		<link>http://www.davosnewbies.com/2000/01/09/home-7/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Knobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davosnewbies.com/?p=98#comment-18</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I went into terminology. Meeting is fine, summit is fine, Davos is fine. 

On confidentiality, the Forum is paranoid about this. They see the participant list -- and the programme itself -- as essential intellectual property. Some of this thinking is merited: without the confidentiality, the Forum would have no recourse if someone did a mass mailing to all participants without permission. But sometimes they carry their thinking above and beyond the call of duty. 

On Clinton, yes, he&#039;s confirmed. He&#039;ll be there Saturday. It&#039;s an in and out (no overnight), so the logistical demands aren&#039;t as wild as they once looked. But even for a few hours, the president needs an extraordinary amount of support. In contrast, Tony Blair&#039;s people were apologetic about wanting 12 people with the prime minister.

And no, you won&#039;t lose your room (although some people in grander hotels are going to get bumped down -- we&#039;re preparing for the screams of anguish already).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I went into terminology. Meeting is fine, summit is fine, Davos is fine. </p>
<p>On confidentiality, the Forum is paranoid about this. They see the participant list &#8212; and the programme itself &#8212; as essential intellectual property. Some of this thinking is merited: without the confidentiality, the Forum would have no recourse if someone did a mass mailing to all participants without permission. But sometimes they carry their thinking above and beyond the call of duty. </p>
<p>On Clinton, yes, he&#8217;s confirmed. He&#8217;ll be there Saturday. It&#8217;s an in and out (no overnight), so the logistical demands aren&#8217;t as wild as they once looked. But even for a few hours, the president needs an extraordinary amount of support. In contrast, Tony Blair&#8217;s people were apologetic about wanting 12 people with the prime minister.</p>
<p>And no, you won&#8217;t lose your room (although some people in grander hotels are going to get bumped down &#8212; we&#8217;re preparing for the screams of anguish already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

